Law Office Dallas

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (the law of the land) stipulates that the Federal Reserve Banks of each region are owned by the member banks in it. These Fed banks are privately owned corporations that make a great effort to hide the fact that they, in fact, own what the public largely thinks is part of the public treasury and government. It’s easy to think that as Fed chairmen and seven of the twelve Governors are appointed by the President and approved by the Senate. As such, the FRB is a sort of quasi-government entity, but the fact is the System is a privately owned for profit enterprise just like any other business. It has stockholders like other public corporations that are paid 6% risk free interest every year on their equity holdings. The public doesn’t know this, and it likely wouldn’t be good PR if it found out. People might be even more upset if they learned some of the owners of our Federal Reserve are powerful foreign investors in the UK, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Italy. They’re partners with giant US banks like JP Morgan Chase and Citibank as well as powerful Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs in a new world order banking cartel that influences and affects business activity everywhere and our lives.

43 years ago one president decided to act on behalf of the people who elected him. That man was John Kennedy, who before his death planned to end the Federal Reserve System to eliminate the national debt a central bank creates by printing money and loaning it to the government. That debt has now risen to over $8,400,000,000,000 ($8.4 trillion) which every taxpayer must pay for and has done so in the amount of nearly $174,000,000,000 ($174 billion) in just the first three months of 2006. This debt service is now an annualized amount exceeding two-thirds of a trillion dollars. It’s made the bankers rich (which was the whole idea) and the public poorer because we’re taxed to pay the tab. It’s no exaggeration to call this the greatest financial scam in world history and one that gets greater every day.

The debt was less onerous 40 years ago, but Kennedy understood its danger to the country and the burden it placed on the public. Thus, on June 4, 1963, he issued presidential order EO 11110 giving the president authority to issue currency. He then ordered the US Treasury to print over $4 billion worth of "United States Notes" to replace Federal Reserve Notes. He intended to replace them all when enough of the new currency was in circulation so he could end the Federal Reserve System and the control it gave the international bankers over the US government and the public. Just months after the Kennedy plan went into effect, he was assassinated in Dallas in what was surely a coup d’etat disguised to look otherwise and may well have been carried out at least in part to save the Fed System and concentration of power it created that was so profitable for the powerful bankers in the country. Those benefitting from it had good reason to be involved in the plot to save the special privilege they weren’t willing to give up without a fight. It’s a plausible explanation that may explain who may have been behind the assassination and for what reason. Whatever the truth is, the banking cartel was only in distress a short time. Once Lyndon Johnson took office, he rescinded Kennedy’s presidential order and restored the cartel’s former power. It’s kept it ever since and is now, of course, more powerful than ever. Even presidents are unable to stop it and those who would try have a lesson from history to give them pause.

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Stephen_Lendman/Federal_Reserve.html
McCain and Obama, like the Bushs, Clintons, and Kerry and Gore, were all funded by Investment Banks involved with the Federal Reserve like Goldman Sachs, Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase.

http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/candidate.cfm?CandidateID=C0009

http://www.whitehouseforsale.org/candidate.cfm?CandidateID=C0005

This is one of the wackier Kennedy Assassination theories.

The theories point to Executive Order 11110 signed by Kennedy which delegated authority to the Treasury Secretary to print silver certificates at will (ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_11110 ). The theory goes that this would put the Federal Reserve out of business.

One only needs to examanine the claims to realize how silly the theory is.

- Given all the Fed duties and responsibilities, to claim that issuing silver certificates would nullify all the Fed duties is preposterous

- Ever since it’s inception, the Federal Reserve has worked with whatever the currency of the realm. Federal Reserve notes circulated along side silver certificates, gold certificates, and coins. From a day-to-day operations side, it really makes no difference.

- History showed that the government was trying to get away from the silver standard. Silver prices were rising to the point where a silver dollar would have more than a dollars worth of silver. This executive order was seen as giving the Treasury Secretary more flexibility to do that.

- There was not enough silver to replace all the currency in circulation with silver certificates.

- Kennedy scholars have concluded it is a hoax. In this link (http://www.devvy.com/patriot4_20021117.html ), there is a story on a Ron Paul aide doing research to ‘prove’ the story only to come up empty.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/weberman/jfk.htm

http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/jfkeo/eo/11110.htm

http://www.devvy.com/patriot4_20021117.html

Recently a judge ruled against red light camera operators in Dallas. They were found to be illegally operating without a license. Can I file a lawsuit against the camera operator like the attorney in Dallas did and get my money back for my red light violations?

Sorry David,

The Dallas decision was unique due to political circumstances that the camera operations were not properly approved by the local government.

I suppose it is possible the same thing happened in your jurisdiction but most unlikely.

Even a future law suit in your jurisdiction happened to come to the same conclusion, the Court judgment would not likely be applied to past convictions that were not appealed nor still on appeal. Very few laws apply retroactively.

http://www.newsday.com/

Associated Press Writer

November 12, 2006, 3:42 PM EST

FARMERS BRANCH, Texas — This Dallas suburb could become the first city in Texas to adopt a sweeping ordinance intended to keep out illegal immigrants, a cause for concern among its large minority population.

More than 50 municipalities nationwide have considered, passed or rejected laws banning landlords from leasing to illegal immigrants, penalizing businesses that employ undocumented workers and making English the local official language.

But until now, that trend hasn’t been matched in the Lone Star State.

"This is the first town in Texas that had the guts to do what’s right," Susie Hart, who grew up in Farmers Branch, said during a recent demonstration outside City Hall. "The education system is tanking, health care has gone through the roof, everybody is bilingual."

Such sentiments and the proposed ordinance trouble many people in Texas, where many Latino families can trace their roots here to the era before statehood.

"This is not just a Farmers Branch problem," Elizabeth Villafranca said of the proposal.

Villafranca, whose family owns a Mexican restaurant in Farmers Branch, said she worries that such laws will spread to other cities if the City Council approves the proposal. The measure is expected to be submitted to the council on Monday, but there was no indication when it might be put to a vote.

Since 1970, Farmers Branch has changed from a small, predominantly white bedroom community with a declining population to a city of almost 28,000 people, about 37 percent of them Hispanic, according to the census.

It also is home to more than 80 corporate headquarters and more than 2,600 small and mid-size firms, many of them minority-owned.

The local debate over illegal immigration began in August and spawned demonstrations by both sides of the issue. Council members adopted a resolution criticizing the federal government for not aggressively addressing the issue.

A councilman has given city attorneys drafts of an ordinance that would make English the city’s official language and proposals to fine companies and landlords who do business with illegal immigrants.

The Farmer’s Branch proposal follows a vote this year in Hazleton, Pa., to fine landlords who rent to illegal immigrants, deny business permits to companies that employ them and require tenants to register and pay for a rental permit. However, a federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of the Hazleton ordinance while he considers a lawsuit against the town by the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, the American Civil Liberties Union and other groups.

More than a dozen other Pennsylvania cities have taken up similar ordinances, as have several others in the South and a handful in California.

Many of the towns and counties have based their ordinances on a model provided by the Immigration Reform Law Institute, which favors limits on immigration and is affiliated with the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

"They’ve all expressed a great deal of frustration with the failure of the federal government to respond" to illegal immigration, said Mike Hethmon, the institute’s general counsel.

Critics fear the spread of anti-illegal immigration rules will lead to sanctioned discrimination and racism.

"It’s basically saying those people are illegal in their very nature; it is all right to be against them because they are lawbreakers. Many people are assuming that all immigrants are lawbreakers, and that people who are different, who speak a different language, are to be shunned," said Cesar Perales, president and general counsel of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund
Miss Erin, are you speaking from personal experience?

HEY !!!
ISN’T THE WAR AGAINST THE TERRORIST MORE IMPORTANT !!!
PLUS I HAVEN’T HEARD FARM WORKERS BOMBING AND BEHEADING PEOPLE !!!